Answer:
Focus group
Explanation:
Focus group is a small group of people who are introduced in an open discussion for research purpose. In the given question there is a informal session with 6 - 10 customers in which their opinions are considered about a firms products. This is a small group session which is initiated to identify product features and how these customers use these products. This is focus group for research purpose.
<span>agreement to modify an existing contract would be the answer</span>
Answer:
The answer is:
Total loss to the left of the intersection
Total profit to the right of the intersection
Explanation:
Cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis is a method that looks into the impact of how varying levels of costs and volume will affect the operating profit of a firm. This gives companies good understanding of the profitability of their products or services.
To answer the question above;
Total loss to the left of the intersection
Total profit to the right of the intersection
While the intersection is the break-even
Answer:
the exchange rate and the trade deficit to decrease.
Explanation:
A deficit can be defined as an amount by which money, falls short of its expected or required value.
Generally, deficit in financial accounting is usually as a result of expense exceeding revenue or revenue falling below expenses at a specific period of time.
For instance, when liabilities exceeds assets or import exceeds export there would be a deficit in the financial account.
Generally, a deficit on the current account ultimately implies that the value of goods and services exported is lower than the value of goods and services being imported in a particular country.
In 2013, government began with a budget deficit and a trade deficit. During the year, the government changed its policy and is now running a budget surplus.
Hence, this change in policy will cause the exchange rate and the trade deficit to decrease if all other factors hold constant
Answer:
b. not protected by the First Amendment
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the Julia's website is not protected by the First Amendment. This is because the Supreme Court has never interpreted freedom of speech to allow the inclusion of obscenities. Which "threatening posts about celebrities" would fall under the category of obscenity and not be protected under the First Amendment.
