False.
This is a periodic tenancy because Tom, as the tenant, may rent the apartment for successive periods under his lease, despite being "month-to-month." A tenancy at will, however, allows either the landlord or the tenant to terminate the arrangement at any time because there is more flexibility in the arrangement.
One key difference is the issue of the tenant's notice to vacate the apartment. Under periodic tenancy, the law typically requires the tenant to give at least one period (here, one month) notice to the landlord of the tenant's wish to leave the property. No such notice requirement is typically found within a tenancy at will.
Answer:
The statement is true.
Explanation:
Unit elastic is described as the demand or supply curve that is perfectly responsive to the changes in the price. In other words, the demand or the quality supplied will change or vary in accordance with the same percentage as the change in price.
The curve which has elasticity of 1 will be called as unit elastic.
Answer: an online bill payment
Explanation:
I’m doing apex and it shows that the correct answer is an online bill payment
Answer:
Truman has a higher inventory turnover ratio and Stapleton has a higher gross profit ratio ( D )
Explanation:
Truman sell a large number of common household items ( assuming 100 unit )
while Stapleton sells a small number of expensive items ( assuming 20 units )
lets assume : Truman sells at $5 per unit and Stapleton sells at $50 per unit
with the above assumptions
Truman gross profit ratio = $5 * 100 units = $500
Stapleton gross profit ratio = $50 * 20 units = $1000
from the above assumptions you can deduce that the gross profit made by Stapleton is higher although he sells a smaller amount of goods while Truman has a higher Turnover because of its higher number of sold units
Answer:
Increase of 130 million
Explanation:
In this question, we are looking to evaluate what has happened to change in deferred tax assets. We proceed as follows;
Firstly, we calculate the current tax.
Mathematically = 40% of 400 million = 40/100 * 400 million = 160 million
Now, as we can see in the question, a decrease in deferred tax asset resulted in an increase in tax expense to a tune of $50 million
This brings the total tax expense to 160 million + 50 million = 210 million
We can see from the question that the company has only recognized a tax expense of $80 million.
This means that the change in deferred tax asset was an increase of 210 million- 80 million = $130 million
