Answer:
$3.344,67
Explanation:
Investment A( Simple interest) = Cf= Ci x(1+(ixn)) = $10.000 x(1+0,0775*10)=
$17.750
Investment B (Compound interest)= Cf= Ci x(1+i)^n = $10.000 (1+0,0775)^10=
$ 21.094,67
A - B = $17.750 - 21.094,67 = - $3.344,67
The following equation of parabola is given:
p(x)= - 5 x^2 + 240 x - 2475
where p(x) = y
This is a standard form of the parabola. We need to
convert this into vertex form of equation. The equation must be in the form:
y – k = a (x – h)^2
Where h and k are the vertex of the parabola. Therefore,
y = - 5 x^2 + 240 x - 2475
y = -5 (x^2 – 48 x + 495)
Completing the square:
y = -5 (x^2 - 48 x + 495 + _) - (-5)* _
Where the value in the blank _ is = -b/2
Since b = -48 therefore,
y = -5 (x^2 – 48 x + 495 + 81) + 405
y – 405 = -5 (x^2 – 48 x + 576)
y – 405 = -5 (x – 24)^2
Therefore the vertex is at points (24, 405).
The company should make 24 tables per day to attain maximum
profit.
A in the expected future exchange rate increases the demand for u.s. dollars. in the u.s. demand for imports does not change the demand for u.s. dollars.
In economics, demand is the number of goods that consumers are willing to purchase at various prices in a particular location and during a particular period of time. [1] The relationship between price and quantity demanded is also called the demand curve. Demand for a particular item is a function of perceived need, price, perceived quality, convenience, available alternatives, disposable income, buyer preferences, and many other options.
Demand refers to the consumer's willingness to buy and pay for goods and services without hesitation. Simply put, demand is the number of items that customers are willing to purchase at various prices over a period of time.
Learn more about demand here
brainly.com/question/1288364
#SPJ4
Answer:
NOT might lose customers because of a lack of innovation
NOT might not be able to attract essential new investors
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that Samantha who has a bakery is sucessfully run for a year and it is popular also. At the same time she planned for using her profits in order to cover up the similar cost that had done in the last year
So based on this, the risk she has taking is that she not want to lose his customers as there is an innovation lacking also she is not capable to attract the new investors
Therefore the same is to be considered
The Stackelberg solution can be used to find the perfect or stable Nash equilibrium or equilibria.
<h3>What is this equilibrium about?</h3>
Other answers:
Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.
Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.
I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.
Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.
Learn more about equilibrium from
brainly.com/question/517289
#SPJ1
