Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
The prosecuting attorney is responsible
The correct answer is letter B.
Explanation: Philosophy is not a set of ready-made knowledge, a finished system, closed in on itself. Philosophy is a way of thinking and it is also a stance towards the world.
Therefore, philosophical questions cannot be taken as correct or incorrect, all reflections are part of the maturation of the idea, including criticism, whether positive or negative.
H<span>is problem-solving ability in math represents: domain-specific knowledge
Domain specific knowledge is a specified skill that could not be applied to other knowledge. In this case, due some conditioning in brain, Cliff could only understand math and all equations but does not possess the ability to be excel at other subject
</span>
The term discrimination is defined in the text as: <span>4) prejudiced action against a group of people.
This prejudice cause a specific group of people to receive a worse treatment compared to another group of people based on something that they inherit, such as race, gender, religion, or ethnicity.</span>
