The correct answer is authoritarianism. This is defined as a
form of government by which can be described or characterized as having a
strong central power. Though it only contains limited political freedoms by
which denies people a chance of having to participate in the government.
Answer: Smith—permissive; Jones—authoritarian; Johnson—rejecting-neglecting
Explanation: The Smith's are lenient. They don't expect much from their children but they shower all the love and care for their children. This is an example of permissive parenting.
The Jones's are authoritarian. This is just an opposite of permissive parenting. They expect much but show less care.
The Johnson's are rejecting-neglecting. They don't expect anything from the kids and they don't care either.
Answer:
c) identifying the bell as a neutral stimulus; identifying food as the unconditioned stimulus; repeatedly presenting the sound of the bell followed by food; presenting the sound of the bell to produce saliva.
Explanation:
Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov was studying salivation in dogs during the 1890s and comes up with the theory of classical conditioning in which a neutral stimulus was closely associated with the unconditioned stimulus to obtain a particular conditioned response. the theory involves learning to combine an unconditional stimulus that has already given rise to a specific response with a new stimulus so that the new stimulus results in the same response.
Answer:
b. A study in which subjects were assigned to study activities based on an undesirable or unflattering physical characteristic as assessed by members of the research team.
Explanation:
In case the subjects were used in the study judging by their unconventional, undesirable or unflattering looks and physical characteristics, it is better not to tell them the additional information after the study is concluded.
<u>In that case, reveling the additional information can result in subjects being hurt, offended and angry, the reason for choosing them may seem unethical and wrong, and the researcher (and the study) could be put in the problem.</u>
The subjects should not be harmed in the process and this study might cause them emotional harm.
