Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Those who are unwilling or unable to pay for the good do not obtain its benefits.
Explanation:
The excludability feature of goods does not allow individuals to have access to them without having paid for them. Thus, non-excludable goods are those that no one cannot prevent its use. <em>Private goods</em> (clothing, vehicles, houses) are excludable but they are also considered rival goods since when one person uses it another individual cannot consume the goods.
Answer:
Process capability evaluation allows us to:
a. check customer requirements against what a process is able to achieve.
Explanation:
Process capability evaluation involves the set of tools used to analyze the performance of a given process against desired specifications. This means that it measures how well a process performs against targets. There are different measures of process capability. For example, Sigma Six is used as a process capability evaluation. Process capability index is also used to evaluate a process' capability, where the upper and lower limits are measured.
Answer: $33750
Explanation:
First and foremost, we have to calculate the interest paid for the year which will be:
= $750000 X 9%
= $750000 × 0.09
= $ 67500
Therefore, the semi annual payment will them be calculated as:
= $67500 / 2
= $33750
Answer:
Gains from remeasuring a foreign subsidiary’s financial statements from the local currency, which is not the functional currency, into the parent company’s currency should be reported as a(n):_______
d. Part of continuing operations.
Explanation:
Gains from the remeasurement of a subsidiary's financial statements from the local currency to the parent company's currency should be reported as part of the continuing operations. It forms part of the current income. They are not deferred. It is translation adjustments that are reported as other comprehensive income, not gains from remeasurement. Remeasurement gains from a subsidiary's local currency to the parent's are also not extraordinary items.
Answer:
D. Fundamental analysis would now show the corporation is undervalued. The fact that the price was unchanged is not consistent with the efficient markets hypothesis.
Explanation:
Under factors of production, we have Land ,labour ,capital and entrepreneur.
Labour are the prime movers of a business.If a new CEO with a good track record has been employed, then the value of the company will increase.
Technically, that Quadrangle Company has increased its production(which might mean that the goods and services they deliver to their clients has increased or the mode of delivery of services has been improved upon), the value is also meant to increase.
With all these indices in place, fundamental analysis will now show that the corperation is undervalued. so D
Fundamental analysis would now show the corporation is undervalued. The fact that the price was unchanged is not consistent with the efficient markets hypothesis
perfectly fits the answer
