Answer:
I believe the correct answer is it helps the reader to invest in the main character, Sylvester.
Explanation:
This is because the use of a First-Person point of view shows the inner-thoughts, feelings, and ideas of the narrator (or main character). An objective view of something is void of emotions. It is an unbiased text, therefore choice A is incorrect. Answer choice B is also incorrect because understanding "ever characters' thoughts" is Third-Person omniscient, not First-Person. I believe answer choice D is incorrect because the theme of the story is not dependent upon the point of view in which the story is being told.
Hope this helps,
<em>♥A.W.E.</em><u><em>S.W.A.N.</em></u><em>♥</em>
Answer:
Peace will never exist in the world, because somewhere and sometime in the world, someone will be having a dispute
Explanation:
For a second, there seems to be hope when Hazel cries about her son dying. That fleeting moment disappears, and we know this because when George says "you can say that again", she repeats it, misunderstanding his statement because of her average (more like way below average) intellect.
Kurt Vonnegut's goal was not writing a story about courageous people overcoming their weaknesses and defying odds, but how society shuts down those non-conforming, defiant people.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "a. laugh when he sees little Arliss and the new pup playing in the drinking water." Travis not do after Mr. Coates returns home is that a. laugh when he sees little Arliss and the new pup playing in the drinking water<span>a. laugh when he sees little Arliss and the new pup playing in the drinking water</span>
