Hello. Your question is incomplete, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
The labor rate refers to the price of an employee, that is, it refers to the price that will be paid for the work of that employee in relation to the time of work that he or she will perform. The rate of employment, on the other hand, refers to the number of people who have a job within a population. In the case of the question above, the rate of employment charged to a company must be proportional to its ability to pay a fair wage to contracted employees. In this case, to answer your question, it would be necessary to first know the labor rate that a company can promote, so that it is possible to determine the rate of employment that will be demanded. This labor rate, will depend on the defined budget, the expenses and the time of work that will be required of each worker presented by the company.
Answer:
B. Both demonstrate that lqbal had an impact on others after his death.
Explanation:
A faction is a group that strongly disagrees with another group. Thus, option first is correct.
<h3>What is a group?</h3>
A group is a collection of people who collaborate. They each have individual goals that they strive for as a group. While groups work toward distinct objectives, they share a common interest or identity that binds them together. Informal groups and formal groups are the two forms of groupings.
A faction is a phrase commonly used in politics to describe a group that consists of a minority inside a larger organization, such as a government, a political party, or a trade union, and begins to disagree with the rest of the group. The group begins to establish a political goal distinct from the rest of the organization. Hence, option first is correct.
Learn more about group here:
brainly.com/question/15560909
#SPJ6
Answer:
Glaucon seemed to think the answer was no. But Paul Feldman sides with Socrates and Adam Smith—for he knows the answer, at least 87 percent of the time, is yes.
Explanation:
Compared with Feldman's argument, the tale of "The Ring of Gyges" is best described as a counterclaim to the idea that most people are moral. The tale is about the corruption of a man, Gyges, that found a ring that made him invisible. One he had that power he saw no reason to follow society's morals and did whatever he wanted to. One could argue that the reason that many people have to "behave" or to act according to the law and morals of a society is the look of others. The judgment that one would encounter should he not follow a certain rule, even if they are "little" things.
D is the correct answer, I'm 100% sure about that
