Kim's age is twice of that of her sister. We'll let k2 = Kim and k = Kim's sister.
So, k2. When you add Kim's age to her sister age you get 36.
Because Kim is twice the age of her sister k2. And because it said 'add' then we put a + sign. k2 + s = 36. Now let's solve it.
k2 + k = 36 < Given
3k = 36 < Combine like terms
k = 12 < Divide both sides by 3
We know Kim's sister is 12 y/o but what about Kim herself? Earlier we assigned Kim to k2. Substitute 12 for k and you get 12(2) = 24
Kim's sister is 12 y/o and Kim is 24 y/o
Please give Brainliest!
Answer:



Step-by-step explanation:
You draw one card at random from a standard deck of 52 playing cards
Total cards = 52
5 even numbers in each suit. 4 times 5 = 20 even number cards

(b) the card is a heart or a diamond
there are 13 heart and 13 diamonds

(c) the card is a nine or a face card
There are 4 nine and 12 face cards

-21, -46 are the two integers that make a sum of -67
Answer: x=
7
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic to check the hypothesis is given by:
And is distributed with n-2 degreed of freedom. df=n-2[/tex]
For this case we got a significant result that means that the real correlation coefficient is different from 0 . And for this case the best interpretation would be:
This result indicates that earning more money influences people to recycle more than people who earn less money
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coeffcient is given by this formula:
For this case we know that this value of r is positive and represent a string correlation between income level and the number of containers of recycling
In order to test the hypothesis if the correlation coefficient it's significant we have the following hypothesis:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic to check the hypothesis is given by:
And is distributed with n-2 degreed of freedom. df=n-2[/tex]
For this case we got a significant result that means that the real correlation coefficient is different from 0 . And for this case the best interpretation would be:
This result indicates that earning more money influences people to recycle more than people who earn less money