In the figure, ∠1 ≅ ∠2, ∠3 ≅ ∠4, and . You can justify the conclusion that ∠TKL ≅ ∠TLK by stating _____

Mathematics

2 answers:

Amiraneli [1.4K]2 years ago

5 0

The answer is "that supplements of congruent angles are congruent" because in order for the angles to be congruent to complete SAS their supplements must be congruent.

VladimirAG [237]2 years ago

3 0

From the question, we know that we will be looking at <3, <4, and angles TKL and TLK. That being said, since <3 is congruent to <4, that means that angles TKL and TLK, which are each supplementary to either angle 3 or 4, are congruent because, since angles 3 and 4 are congruent, they are congruent because the supplements of congruent angles are congruent.

You might be interested in

Help picture below problem 13

kirza4 [7]

The Pythagorean theorem is the idea that the sum of the two legs which are both squared is equal to the hypotenuse's length squared.

*look at the image I attached for a better explanation

By looking at the picture, we are missing the leg's length, and by using the Pythagorean theorem, we get the equation

$?^2+5^2 = 13^2\\?^2 + 25 = 169\\?^2 = 144\\? = 12$