This question is a bit tricky to answer because it does not state how often interest rate is applied so lets say for the simple 5% interest rate the rate of interest was calculated after 2 years you would pay a total interest of $15 since interest was only calculated once but for the 3% calculating every year with compound it would be a total of 18.27 dollars in interest but then you would have to calculate the 5% simple interest the same way which would total to $30 if calculated once a year being more than the 3% compound. But lets say interest is calculated once a month your total for the 5% simple interest would be $360 dollars interest for those 2 years and the 3% compound would be $406.97 dollars in interest. So over all the less amount of times interest compounds the less interest there is making it more worth than the simple but if the compounding occurs more frequently the simple 5% interest is more worth it. In this situation I think it might just be yearly interest which makes the 3% compound more worth taking for this short amount of time.
Direct material cost variance = (Standard price - Actual Price) * Actual Quantity
= ($50 - $51) * 47,000
= $47,000 adverse
Answer:
Darla's amount realized on the sale is $800
Adjusted basis in the assets sold is $300
Producing a realized gain on the sale of $500
Explanation:
Amount realized = cash received + FMV of other property + buyer’s assumption of seller’s liabilities – seller’s expenses
Amount realized = 600 + 200 + 0 -0
= $800
Adjusted basis = initial basis – cost recovery deductions
Adjusted basis = 2500-2200 = $300
Gain or loss realized = amount realized – adjusted basis = 800-300
= $500
Therefore Darla's amount realized on the sale is $800 and the adjusted basis in the assets sold is $300, producing a realized gain on the sale of $500
The delegates requested that each state write a constitution during the Second Continental Congress.
Answer: This is the type of cost known as Sunk.
- sunk cost is a cost that has already been incurred and cannot be recovered. Sunk costs are contrasted with prospective costs, which are future costs that may be avoided if action is taken.
- A sunk cost refers to money that has already been spent and which cannot be recovered. ... Sunk costs are excluded from future business decisions because the cost will remain the same regardless of the outcome of a decision.
- The sunk cost effect is manifested in a greater tendency to continue an endeavor once an investment in money, effort, or time has been made. Evidence that the psychological justification for this behavior is predicated on the desire not to appear wasteful is presented.
