Answer:
- Reduce discrimination.
- Reduce exploitation.
- Reduce inequality/ poverty.
- Increase productivity.
- Economic growth.
Explanation:
It is necessary for the government to regulate wages because some companies might take advantage of little regulation to get away with many unjust and unethical actions as they chase profits or due to personal bias.
Without government regulation, there would be wage disparity between races and genders so regulation reduces that. Exploitation will also be reduced because companies will not take advantage of unemployment rates to make workers overwork themselves to keep their jobs.
Regulated wages will reduce inequality in social classes as well as poverty rates as people will be paid closer to what they deserve.
Regulated wages will also lead to improved productivity as people will be more encouraged when they are working knowing they are getting paid appropriately so they will work harder.
With people being paid appropriately, they will be able to afford more goods and invest more savings which will lead to growth in the economy.
Answer:
A firm with financial leverage has a larger equity multiplier than an otherwise identical firm with no debt in its capital structure.
Explanation:
The equity multiplier basically tells us what portion of the company's assets were financed through equity, i.e. what portion was financed by the company's owners.
the formula to determine the equity multiplier = total assets / total equity
the higher the equity multiplier, the higher the return on equity (ROE), but a high equity multiplier (financial leverage) also increases the company's risk since eventually it might not be able to pay off its creditors if something goes wrong.
Answer:
The correct option is E,Ted's annuity has a higher present value than Allison's
Explanation:
Both annuities do not have equal amount today as $1000 received today is higher in value terms than $1000 receivable in a month's time since cash receivable earlier is much more valued than the one receivable later.
Ted's annuity is an annuity due not an ordinary annuity
Allison's annuity is an ordinary annuity not annuity due
Allison's annuity has a lower present value than Ted's and not the other way round.
The only correct statement is option E,since Ted is expected to receive $1000 today, his annuity has a higher present value compared to Allison's
