Gunther is becoming frustrated with the television in his hotel room. He wants to scan through the channels very rapidly, but ea
ch time he switches the channel he has to wait a full two seconds before he can change it again. During that brief delay, it is impossible to change the channel. This is similar to how the __________ works in neural communication.A) regenerative timeout B) potential gradation C) absolute refractory period D) relative refractory period
Answer: This is similar to how the ABSOLUTE REFRACTORY PERIOD works in Neural communication.
Explanation: The REFRACTORY period refers to the the period, after excitation, during which a membrane recovers its polarization and is not able to respond to a second stimulus.
In this period, it is impossible to react to stimuli.
A perfect example can be observed in the physiology of a man when having sex and have reached orgasm. The period that which the individual recovers from the orgasm to continue sex is referred to as the absolute refractory period.
The absolute refractory period is the period that is started from the initiation period of action potential to the immediately after peak point. This is called the Absolute Refractory Period. This is the time between neuron action potential and not lead the second action potential. The absolute refractory period takes around 1 to 2 minutes.
Thus here Gunther is becoming frustrated with television in the hotel room. He has been scanned through channels. This is the example of an absolute refractory period.
Telegraphic speech is a stage of language acquisition in which only the most important words are used to express an idea.
In this case, the most important idea is that the cat is wet, the rest are details on how she got wet, or when, or which liquid it was. It's typical behavior on children in their early stages of language acquisition.
Under the principles discussed in "A Sample Court Case," United States v. Jones, the court is most likely to rule that the officers' installation of the device was not a search because the officers did not obtain a warrant. Chris's argument was right; there should be a warrant presented for it to be considered as a lawful search.
