Answer:
$38,771.44
To achieve at least the 8% rate Walt can pay until this amount.
Explanation:
The goal would be to calcualte the present value for each cashflow using the expected rate of 8%
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-&Cash Flow&Discounted\\Year \: 1&12,500&11,574.0740740741\\Year \: 2&10,000&8,573.38820301783\\Year \: 3&7,500&5,953.74180765127\\Year \: 4&5,000&3,675.14926398227\\Year \: 5&2,500&1,701.45799258438\\Year \: 6&0&0\\Year \: 7&12,500&7,293.62994077667\\Total&50,000&38,771.4412820865\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D-%26Cash%20Flow%26Discounted%5C%5CYear%20%5C%3A%201%2612%2C500%2611%2C574.0740740741%5C%5CYear%20%5C%3A%202%2610%2C000%268%2C573.38820301783%5C%5CYear%20%5C%3A%203%267%2C500%265%2C953.74180765127%5C%5CYear%20%5C%3A%204%265%2C000%263%2C675.14926398227%5C%5CYear%20%5C%3A%205%262%2C500%261%2C701.45799258438%5C%5CYear%20%5C%3A%206%260%260%5C%5CYear%20%5C%3A%207%2612%2C500%267%2C293.62994077667%5C%5CTotal%2650%2C000%2638%2C771.4412820865%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)

<em><u>For example year 3</u></em>

Then we add each cashflow, to get the present value of the project.
To achieve at least the 8% rate Walt can pay until this amount.
Let the amount received by the first person = x
First person receives: x
Second person receives: 2x - 6
Third person receives: 2x - 6 + 7 = 2x + 1
Solve for x
x + (2x - 6) + (2x + 1) = $180
5x - 5 = $180
5x = $185
x = $37
First person receives: $37
Second person receives: 2(37) - 6 = $68
Third person receives: 2(37) + 1 = $75
Answer:
Yes under the theory of conversion.
Explanation:
Conversion occurs when an individual takes possession of an item and excercises ownership of it in a way that is in conflict with the real owner's right of possession.
In this instance Eddy paid in a cheque that was not owned by him. The onus was on the bank to confirm from the account owner the real beneficiary of the check.
This would have prevented the conversion of the check through an illegal indorsement.
Conversion is a common type of fraud with regards to dividend warrants where dividend warrants edited to present a different person as the owner of the check.
Answer:
Direct labor cost will be equal to $236000
Explanation:
We have given total manufacturing cost = $450000
Manufacturing overhead totaling is equal to $98000
And direct material totaling is equal to $116000
We have to find the direct labor cost
Direct labor cost is equal to
Direct labor cost = Total manufacturing cost - manufacturing overhead totaling - direct material totaling
= $450000 - $98000 - $116000 = $236000
So direct labor cost will be equal to $236000
Answer:
The overview of the given statement is described in the explanation segment below.
Explanation:
<u>Monopoly Market:
</u>
-
The demand curve or market price towards the firm was indeed sloping downhill. MR is also below P and AR.
- Therefore, when earnings are maximized, whereby MR = MC has been used. Price is therefore above MR (Marginal Revenue).
<u>Perfectly Competitive Market:
</u>
- The price shall be calculated whenever market forces are equivalent.
- The firm seems to be the fixed price and therefore the individual company market price becomes horizontal.
Thus,
⇒ 
Hence,
⇒ 