Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Not a function
2. Function
3. Function
4. Not a function
5. Not a function
6. Function
7. Function
8. Not a Function
9. Function
10. Not a Function
Answer:
2.0
Step-by-step explanation:
Couldn't really understnd what you wrote but I'll assume it's the standard deviation of a fair, 7-sided die
The standard deviation is just the square root of the variance (which is just the second moment minus the first moment squared)
The first moment (AKA the average is..)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31730/317305ef346092707756aff7e0e83237891f7801" alt="\frac{1+2+3+4+5+6+7}{7}=4"
The second moment is..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f16e7/f16e7970214f9f2248b8f17d5be3398c5e21a108" alt="\frac{1^2+2^2+3^2+4^2+5^2+6^2+7^2}{7}=20"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f338/9f338b07a2e99254fe205d8f3df603df20175da8" alt="\sqrt{20-4^2}=2"
Answer:
See the argument below
Step-by-step explanation:
I will give the argument in symbolic form, using rules of inference.
First, let's conclude c.
(1)⇒a by simplification of conjunction
a⇒¬(¬a) by double negation
¬(¬a)∧(2)⇒¬(¬c) by Modus tollens
¬(¬c)⇒c by double negation
Now, the premise (5) is equivalent to ¬d∧¬h which is one of De Morgan's laws. From simplification, we conclude ¬h. We also concluded c before, then by adjunction, we conclude c∧¬h.
An alternative approach to De Morgan's law is the following:
By contradiction proof, assume h is true.
h⇒d∨h by addition
(5)∧(d∨h)⇒¬(d∨h)∧(d∨h), a contradiction. Hence we conclude ¬h.
Answer:
14/3 or 4 2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope it helps :)
Brainliest pls? Have a good day/night
Answer:
$18.75
Step-by-step explanation:
75 divided among the 4 sisters equally