Answer:
c. The Long Arm Statute.
Explanation:
The legal jurisdiction "Long Arm Statute" refers to the liberty of a state to have jurisdiction against an out-of-state defendant in a legal case. In other words, this statute means that a state has the right to persecute an out-of-state offender who commits the offense in the visiting state. Simply put, the state has a long arm to reach other states and bring the offenders to court.
In the given scenario, Megan is from New York but commits the offense of running a red light and hitting Sarah while in Texas. So, when Sarah files the lawsuit against Megan, the state of Texas can exercise the "Long Arm Statute" against Megan and persecute her despite being a New York citizen and not a Texas resident.
Thus, the correct answer is option c.
Answer:
B "Declaration of Independence is adopted" is the answer
Explanation:
The alt of the war between the French and British nationalities ended in 1763 in America. The war had raged the mountains of the British colonies and the army, but the French military had a made friendship with the natives in America.
When the war came to completion, the British fought to prevent the occurrence of such wars and conflicts because of the increased number of the American colonies. Therefore they stretched to into the continent away from the British powers.
Answer: Washington was not in favor of political parties. He wanted it to be about the best candidatewinning rather than it being about two parties preventing all other parties from having a chance atbeing elected.Washington felt that political parties would be the down fall of our country. Hewrote a letter to the nation warning the people of the danger of political parties, and how theywould turn the government from a group of people interested in their nation's future to a powerhungry professional politicians
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is True.
Explanation:
A tort is a civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer legal liabilities caused by a wrongful act committed. If Bill did nothing wrong and he is being accused by the store of theft and he did nothing wrong. He can put the store in court because of emotional distress and negligence. <u>In this case, the answer is True and the store is committing a tortious act</u>.
