Answer:
Source amnesia
Explanation:
Source amnesia: It refers to the incapability to remember the W's of acquiring previously learned information causing to retain factual knowledge. Here, the W's refer to them when, where and how of the information. Source amnesia malfunctions an individual's explicit memory.
In source amnesia, an individual might remember a piece of new information but not its source i.e, from where it came. It can also help to explain déjà vu.
In the question above, Steve's mistaken recall best illustrates source amnesia.
<u>Answer:</u>
The decision from any journalist that violates the ethics of journalism is "A reporter writes a story about his wife’s company without revealing their relationship" and "A magazine runs a series of articles speculating about a celebrity’s medical history".
Option: (c) and (d)
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Society of Professional Journalists is the organization that represents the entire journalists of United States and it sets the boundary line for the journalist’s activities.
- For any journalist who attempts to write about the company of his wife without any mentioned relationship of theirs, it would violate the law.
- Similarly, it is beyond the ethics to write the series of reports about the medical history of celebrity.
It's called investing. Hope this helps c: