Yes because the unit rate would be 1:2 and that's the rate of change in which 3:5 has.
HOPE IT HELPS!!
Answer:
1191.4 ; 34.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the data:
29; 37; 38; 40; 58; 67; 68; 69; 76; 86; 87; 95; 96; 96; 99; 106; 112; 127; 145; 150
The sample variance and standard deviation can be obtained thus :
Σ(X - m)² / (n - 1)
Where, m = mean of the sample
n = sample size
The standard deviation equals, sqrt(variance )
Using a calculator:
The variance, σ² ;
Mean = Σx / n = 1681 / 20 = 84.05
(x -m)^2
[(29-84.05)^2 + (37-84.05)^2 + (38-84.05)^2 + (40-84.05)^2 + (58-84.05)^2 + (67-84.05)^2 + (68-84.05)^2 + (69-84.05)^2 + (76-84.05)^2 + (86-84.05)^2 + (87-84.05)^2 + (95-84.05)^2 + (96-84.05)^2 + (96-84.05)^2 + (99-84.05)^2 + (106-84.05)^2 + (112-84.05)^2 + (127-84.05)^2 + (145-84.05)^2 + (150-84.05)^2] / 19
22636.95 / 19
= 1191.4184 = 1191.42
Standard deviation = sqrt( Variance)
Standard deviation = sqrt(1191.4184)
Standard deviation = 34.516929 = 34.52
Answer:
$172.80
Step-by-step explanation:
$160.00 x 1.08=$172.80
Please write x^2, not x2.
If you stretch the graph of y=x^2 vertically by a factor of 4, the resulting graph represents the quadratic function y = 4x^2. It's still a parabola, but appears to be thinner.
This particular question is about horizontal stretching, however. Stretching the graph horizontally by a factor of 4 results in the new function g(x) = (x/4)^2. Try graphing x^2 and also (x/4)^2 on the same set of axes to observe this phenomenon.
