Solution :
The risk averse is the person who wishes to reduce the uncertainty attached to the money.
Certain income = $2000.
50-50 chance of 1000 and 3000 would income expected income of
(0.5 x 1000) +(0.5 x 3000) = 2000
Both of them gives an equal amount of income while there is uncertainty attached with the second case which makes the risk averse person disincline to follow.
Hence the statement is FALSE.
Assume that the population level in a country is X. 5 percent of the population are likely to get affected by the disease due to which it makes a population of 0.05 X population to be effected by the disease. The population level will cost $38,000, hence making the total healthcare cost to be 1900 X.
It excludes money paid as salaries or wages to employees.
Answer:
The correct answer is normative analysis.
Explanation:
A positive analysis is the one that attempts to reflect reality with statements of cause and effect and is used mainly in microeconomics. On the other hand, a normative analysis, in which reality is prescribed, that is, we go beyond explanation and prediction, value judgments are used.
In contrast to the positive analysis, the normative analysis responds how the law should achieve efficiency objectives. This analysis assumes that efficiency is an objective that law should reflect and that legal norms should change when they fail. From this perspective, efficiency is a social value that the Law should promote.
To solve this question, take 3% of $10,000 to see what the increase would be:
$10,000 x 3% = $300
There is an increase of $300 due to the 3% credit card processing fee that the credit card company is imposing on Elliston.
