The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I do not agree with Bolívar about Gran Columbia. I really respect Simon Bolíver, better known as the Great Liberator, and understand what his idea was in those early years of independence from the Spanish crown.
He thought that the vast territory called Gran Columbia would be stronger against any threats, including revenge from the Spanish crown if it remained like that. That is why he created a Constitution to rule that vast territory.
However, there were many differences and interests involved in those regions that conformed Gran Columbia. Let's remember that Gran Columbia was formed by the territories of Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, and Panama.
How might South America be different today if his vision had been accepted?
Of course, it had been very different. Gran Columbia would have been a rich and powerful territory for the diversity of its people and natural resources. There would have been many industries exploiting raw materials and exporting them in favorable trade agreements due to the size of the production.
False i need 20 <span>characters</span> so i will just type this
Civil war was fought over the moral issue of slavery. In fact, it was the economics of slavery and political control of that was central to the conflict. A key issue was states right. The southern states wanted to assert their authority over the federal government so they could abolish federal laws interfering with the Souths right to keep slaves and take them wherever they wished.
Another factor was territorial expansion. The South wished
to take slavery into the western territories, while the North was commited to keeping them open to white labour alone. Meanwhile the newly formed Republican party, whose members were strongly opposed to the west ward expansion of slavery into news state was gaining prominence.
The election of a Republican, Abraham Lincoln, as president in 1860 sealed the deal. His victory with a single southern electoral vote was a clear signal to the Southern states that they had lost all influence.
When transforming a short story into a play, particular aspects of the "story" itself might be left out. Short stores are designed to be read and considered by a solitary reader who can imagine the events being described. A play, however, is designed to be performed on stage, live, in front of an audience. A play, by virtue of its structure, cannot offer all of the details that a short story can, especially in terms of internal narration, and a variety of different settings and locations.
Answer:
Radical Republicans wanted to see the South punished, while Republicans supported Lincoln’s plan.
Explanation:
the Radicals had very little sympathy for the South, after the war ended.