Answer:
98.3 seconds
Step-by-step explanation:
If you use stoichometry you can convert your units
9.83 seconds
over 100 meters a kilometer is 1000 meters so
9.83/100 *10 because what you do to denominator needs to happen to numerator
98.3 seconds
over 1 kilometer
it take the sprinter 98.3 seconds to run a kilometer and one way to check is well a kilo is a longer distance so logically the time it takes them has to be higher cause they cannot run a kilo faster than they run 1/10 of it
Ooooppppppp— homie not gettin nun at home I see
Actually I can help you in three of them as the number "3" is not confined between the arrays ND and NE
So:
It would be
angle END
or
angle DNE
or
angle N
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Corresponding angles of both the squares are congruent. (angles of a square measure 90°)
Ratio of the sides of the given squares = ![\frac{\text{Side length of small square}}{\text{Side length of the large square}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%5Ctext%7BSide%20length%20of%20small%20square%7D%7D%7B%5Ctext%7BSide%20length%20of%20the%20large%20square%7D%7D)
= ![\frac{2}{5}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B5%7D)
This ratio of side lengths is constant for all corresponding sides.
Therefore, corresponding sides are proportional.
Since, all angles of both the squares are congruent and all the sides are proportional, both the squares will be similar.
Scale factor = ![\frac{\text{Side length of large square}}{\text{Side length of the smaller square}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%5Ctext%7BSide%20length%20of%20large%20square%7D%7D%7B%5Ctext%7BSide%20length%20of%20the%20smaller%20square%7D%7D)
= ![\frac{5}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B2%7D)
= 2.5
This sequence of similarity transformations shows the figures are similar.
Answer:
so does this go with what you got I would think C correct me if i'm wrong
Step-by-step When a population or group of something is declining, and the amount that decreases is proportional to the size of the population, it's called exponential decay. In exponential decay, the total value decreases but the proportion that leaves remains constant over time.