Answer:
20
Step-by-step explanation:
2×10=20
Or...
10+10=20
It’s phrased very weird, but I believe I have it figured out.
On the map, there distance of the race is 41.9 inches.
So, (41.9)(400) = 16760 feet
Answer:
A.
1. 6/9
2. 6/3
3. 3/6
4. 9/6
5. 3/9
B.
1. 8/12
2. 3/7
3. 5/3
4. 12/15
5. 20/25
Step-by-step explanation:
You can turn a ratio from #:# into #/# so if the ratio was 3:9 the fraction form would be 3/9.
Answer:
a) 9.56%
b) 0.0019
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Find the z-scores.
z = (x − μ) / σ
z₁ = (-0.0050) / 0.0030
z₁ = -1.67
z₂ = (0.0050) / 0.0030
z₂ = 1.67
Find the probability using a chart or calculator.
P(Z < -1.67 or Z > 1.67) = 2 P(Z < -1.67)
P(Z < -1.67 or Z > 1.67) = 2 (0.0478)
P(Z < -1.67 or Z > 1.67) = 0.0956
b) Use a chart or calculator to find the z-score.
P(Z < -z or Z > z) = 0.01
P(Z < -z) = 0.005
z = 2.576
Find the standard deviation.
z = (x − μ) / σ
2.576 = (0.0050) / σ
σ = 0.0019
Correct Question:
Tim is investigating the relationship between the number of years since a tree was planted and the height of the tree in feet. His data are shown in the table. Years Since Tree was Planted vs. Height of Tree
Years since the tree was planted, x
Height of tree in feet, y
2, 17, 3, 25, 5, 42, 6, 47, 7, 54, 9, 69
Using a regression calculator, what is a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old?
Answer/explanation:
There is no good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old. If you analyze careful in details the regression calculator you realize that it probably will not valid that far in to the future say 100 years.