Answer:
Yeah, her argument will be good in Aceves. The further explanation is given below.
Explanation:
The promissory clause applies to just the requirement that although no attorney seems to be legal, a commitment is actionable. This happens whenever the Promiser already made that commitment to something like the Promisee who performs mostly on commitment.
- Aceves having operated throughout the specific situation mostly on the foundation of the Bank's commitment or withdrew its complaint. Therefore in this circumstance, the essential requirement that perhaps the promisee would have focused mostly on promiser is accomplished.
- Consecration of promise to pay estoppels is founded on either the ideals of equity as well as justice. The lender's action was unreasonable to Aceves and because of that, the premise would be effective on either the bank as to when the applicant was working on a pledge basis. Thus Aceves will be accurate in her argument.
Answer:
20.875
Explanation:
18+24+17+21+24+16+29+18=167/8=20.875
The flexible or telecommuting schedule is most likely an option offered in alternative work arrangements. Examples of alternative work arrangements are: f<span>lexible work schedules, the 4/40 workweek, job sharing, and home based work.</span>
Answer:
C) Sell £2,278.13 forward at the 1-year forward rate, F1($/£), that prevails at time zero.
Explanation:
given data
State 1 State 2 State 3
Probability 25% 50% 25%
Spot rate $ 2.50 /£ $ 2.00 /£ $ 1.60 /£
P* £ 1,800 £ 2,250 £ 2,812.50
P $4,500 $4,500 $4,500
solution
company holds portfolio in pound. so to get hedge, they will sell that of the same amount.
we get here average value of the portfolio that is
The average value of the portfolio = £ (0.25*1800 + 0.5*2250 + 0.25*2812.5)
The average value of the portfolio = 2278.13
so correct option is C) Sell £2,278.13 forward at the 1-year forward rate, F1($/£), that prevails at time zero.
