Answer: I would contend that the right answer is the C) whether or not student-athletes are students who participate in sports, or athletes who may also go to class.
Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that Christopher Saffici and Robert Pellegrino wrote their article in 2012 with the title "Intercollegiate athletics vs. academics: the student-athlete or the athlete-student." Their main argument is that the students who are accepted in colleges due to their athletic skills often are not prepared to do well academically while meeting the expectations and demands as athletes, so, in turn, they are given preferential treatment in school, and they are overworked, becoming more athletes that go to college (without truly succeeding academically, as they are supposed to), that students who are also athletes.
In fact, they say that "It is not a question of whether or not the experience for a student-athlete is different from that of a traditional student. Instead, the issue at hand here is whether or not student-athletes are students that participate in extracurricular competitive sports, or have become athletes that also go to classes whenever their athletic schedules allow."
Number 1 I hope it helps :D
Answer:
Political / Regulatory
Explanation:
The political or regulatory environment of business comprises of different stakeholders which includes the government organization, political parties, legislation and laws. It is an environment which deals with activities of these stakeholders and factors affecting the administration of public affairs and business activities of different organizations.
Also, the regulatory environment deals with the activities or laws and legislation that have direct and indirect impacts on business operations. Such as:
1. Regulations on unfair business practices so as to create fair competition.
2. Protection of consumers from unfair business practices.
3. Ensure the society interest in business operations are not overridden by greed capitalist.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The Mexican War was seen as a southern plot because the expansion of slavery across the southwest would add slave states to the country.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- It was believed that the Mexican War was a deliberate initiative of the leaders of the south with a view to acquire the Mexican land so that new slave states would be to the union.
- This was to make the side of the southern states stronger as far as withstanding the issue of the abolishment of slavery was concerned.
Answer:
All states must accept the laws and records of other states as valid.
Explanation:
Section 1 said that when a state sanction a public act, record or judicial proceeding according to the manner in which Congress´s law prevented, these must be recognized by other states.
This was made to unify the individual states and not destroying their power.
There are very cases in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the merits of a case in one state, must be recognized by the courts of other states.
I Hope It's Helpful
Hint The Brainliest :)
