Answer: Fundamental attribution error
Explanation:
Fundamental attribution error also known as correspondence bias is the ability or prediction of people to underemphasize situations based on an individuals observation while over-emphasizing dispositional and personality based explanations as regards their behavior. An example is when something bad happens to a person, the people might blame the person for 75% as regards the behavior which is bad than the event
This was the hypothesis Jake used for his study during the wall street game.
The word that should go in the blank space is <em>"Conformity"</em>.
Conformity is defined as an individual's yielding to group pressure.
In Sherif's autokinetic experiment determined that when a person is put into an ambiguous situation, it will look to other with the objective to reach a common agreement about a conclusion.
Asch's experiment determined that an individual will tend to conform with what the majority says, subordinating to group pressure. Even if this means that the arrived conclusion is incorrect.
Answer:
1.After the Civil War, African Americans were allowed to vote, actively ... saw Reconstruction as a humiliating, even vengeful imposition and did not welcome it.
2.Wilmington, for example, had a population of. 110,000 with 11,000 blacks. However, no black policemen, firemen or lawyers lived in the city.
3.Harriet Tubman. Between 1850 and 1860, she returned to the South numerous times to help parties of other slaves to freedom, guiding them through the lands she knew well. She is aided an estimated 300 persons to escape from slavery, including her parents.
Explanation: Brainliest will be appreciated:)
Answer:
helpful do you mean?
Explanation:
my family and friends, and the president.
Answer: This is known as INTERDEPENDENCE.
Explanation: Interdependence can be defined as the condition of being mutually reliant on somebody or something. A practical example of interdependence is the relationship between plants and animals. Both plants and animals need one another for their survival. This is an example of what happens in the group where Heather concludes that without the input of each members of the group, the quality of their decisions will reduce.