Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
<h3>Complete question</h3>
Beth says that the graph of g(x)=x-5+1 is a translation of 5 units to the left and 1 unit up of f(x) = x. She continues to explain that the point (0,0) on the square root function would be translated to the point (-5,1) on the graph of g(x). Is Beth's description of the transformation correct? Explain
<h3>How to determine the true statement?</h3>
The functions are given as:
g(x) = x - 5 + 1
f(x) = x
When the function f(x) is translated 5 units left, we have:
f(x + 5) = x + 5
When the above function is translated 1 unit up, we have:
f(x + 5) + 1 = x + 5 + 1
This means that the actual equation of g(x) should be
g(x) = x + 5 + 1
And not g(x) = x - 5 + 1
By comparison;
g(x) = x - 5 + 1 and g(x) = x + 5 + 1 are not the same
Hence, Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
Read more about transformation at:
brainly.com/question/17121698
#SPJ1
Answer:
2/ 15
Step-by-step explanation:
since the probability is 16/ 120
then we simplify it till it gets 2/15
hope this helps
and good luck!
ince the problem is only asking for 4 years, we can just calculated it out year by year. Recall the formula for compounding interest: A = P(1+r)n, where A is the total amount, P is the principle (amount you start with), r is the interest rate per period of time, and n is the number of periods (in this case, r is annual interest rate, so n is number of years). At the beginning (Year 0), Lou starts off with 10000: A = 10000 At the end of Year 1, Lou earned interest on that amount, plus he has deposited another 5000: A = 10000(1.08) + 5000 End of Year 2, Lou's interest from the year 0 amount has compounded, he has started earning interest on the amount deposited last year, and he deposits another 5000: A = 10000(1.08)2 + 5000(1.08) + 5000 End of Year 3, same idea. Lou has earned compounding interest on all existing deposits, and deposits another 5000: A = 10000(1.08)3 + 5000(1.08)2 + 5000(1.08) + 5000 End of Year 4, same idea: A = 10000(1.08)4 + 5000(1.08)3 + 5000(1.08)2 + 5000(1.08) + 5000 = 36135.45
Answer: This is a periodic relation.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a periodic relation, that can be modeled with a sinusoidal relation, that relates the height as a function of time.
Then we can write this as h(t) = A*sin(C*t + F) + B
Where A is the amplitude, C is a constant that depends on the period, F is a phase shift, and B is the midpoint of the function.
2*A is the distance between the maximum height and the minimum height.
B is the middle height of the Femis Wheel.
