1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ziro4ka [17]
3 years ago
14

PLEASE HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST

Mathematics
1 answer:
ludmilkaskok [199]3 years ago
4 0
True
true
false
9
are the answers:)
hope this helps!
You might be interested in
Please help me quickly
fiasKO [112]
The answer is B, when you put it into a graphing calculator the Y And X intercept are -5 like in the image
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which expression is equivalent to<br> -15163-3?Assume #w0D
horrorfan [7]

Answer:

Second one.................

4 0
3 years ago
Find an equation of the line that has the given slope and passes through the given point.
masha68 [24]

Answer:

 y = 3x +21

Step-by-step explanation:

m= 3

The y-intercept of the line that passes through the given point  (-7,0) is

 0 = -7(3) + b

b= 21

The equation of the line that passes through the given point  (-7,0) is

 y =mx +b

 y = 3x +21

6 0
3 years ago
Helppp easy quick points
vladimir2022 [97]
Answer should be y=2x+1
3 0
2 years ago
A group of students was discussing the meaning of this statement. They were arguing back and forward about whether the converse
Savatey [412]

Answer:

The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."

The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true,  then q is also correct or true.

And the converse of p → q can be shown as  q → p.

But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.

In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be  "A line can be a part of the ray".

So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.

Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.

Hence, Jahmiah is correct.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Solve this application problem using a system of equations: Dan and June mix two kinds of feed for pedigreed dogs. They wish to
    5·1 answer
  • If the scale factor used was k and the perimeter of the pink trapezoid was P, what would the perimeter of the blue trapezoid be?
    9·1 answer
  • Plz help i need to finish this asap so i can graduate
    11·1 answer
  • which of the numbers 28 33 45 57 39 and 36 could be subtracted from 84 without regrouping? please explain
    7·2 answers
  • Please write a solution then solve it
    13·1 answer
  • Dan spends 2/5 of his wages on rent and 1/2 on food. If he makes £540 per week, how much money does he have left?
    7·1 answer
  • Can u help with 17 and 18 (IF U KNOW BOTH OF THEM) Please thanks
    11·2 answers
  • Me pueden ayudar profabor ​
    12·1 answer
  • Whilst shopping, the probability that Caroline buys fruit is 0.7.
    5·2 answers
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20-%202%20%5Cleqslant%20x%20-%203%20%3C%204" id="TexFormula1" title=" - 2 \leqslant x - 3 &lt
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!