Answer:
$6,666.67 and $10,000
Explanation:
The computation of the depreciation expense for the year 2017 and 2018 is shown below:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)
= ($88,000 - $8,000) ÷ (8 years)
= ($80,000) ÷ (8 years)
= $10,000
Since the machinery is purchased on April 30 and we assume the books are closed on December 31 so the number of months calculated is 8 months
Therefore for the year 2017 the depreciation expense is
= $10,000 × 8 months ÷ 12 months
= $6,666.67
And, for the year 2018 the depreciation expense is same i.e $10,000
<span>C) Cash, debit $11,000; Katelyn's Capital, credit $11,000
</span>
Tuttle enterprises are considering a project that has the following cash flow and the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) data. The projected net present value is 074.36.
A project's net present value is the sum of the destiny values of the net coin flows compounded at the desired fee of going back minus the net funding. if safety gives a series of coin flows with an NPV of $50,000 and an investor will pay exactly $50,000 for it, then the investor's NPV is $0. It method they'll earn something the cut price charge is on the security.
Net present value or NPV is the sum of the prevailing value of coins inflows and outflows. In other phrases, it's far the distinction between the present values of cash inflows and the prevailing value of cash outflows over a while.net gift cost shows how a lot of money an assignment or investment will advantage or lose in terms of the present-day budget. future coins drift would not carefully mirror the current cash drift of an undertaking because of the impact of factors along with inflation and lost compound hobby so NPV adjusts for this reason.
Learn more about Net present value here:-brainly.com/question/18848923
#SPJ4
Answer:
Probably not, because Alyssa made a mistake about the dog's value, not a mistake about material fact.
Explanation:
When Sierra offered to sell the dog to Allysa, Allysa failed to discuss the ancestry of the puppy. She wrongly believed the dog came from a line of champions.
On finding out the dog is only worth $200, she will not be able to rescind the contract because the onus to ask all relevant questions about the purchase before accepting is on her.
She made the mistake of assuming the dog was worth $800. She made a mistake about the dog's value and not the material fact.