Answer: Its D. Save your document Frequently
Explanation: Hoped i helped!
Answer:
D) it presumes there will be economic gains even if output does not become internationally competitive
Explanation:
The argument for import protection in developing countries to bring about industrialization differs from the infant-industry argument in that it presumes there will be economic gains even if the output does not become internationally competitive. International competitiveness is a step of the relative cost of services/goods from a nation. Countries that can provide a similar quality of goods at a cheaper cost are stated to be extra competitive.
Answer:
the three of them could be held personally liable:
- I. John
- II. John's manager
- III. The CEO, who in this specific case we assume could have prevented the crime.
Explanation:
John committed forgery and possibly fraud by forging clients' signatures on documents held by the company. His boss ordered him to do so, so he is also responsible for John's actions. John can even try to put all the blame on his boss alleging that he was forced to forge the signatures. The CEO of the firm is also responsible because the forged documents had to serve someone's illegal purposes, and the CEO probably was the one that needed them or knew about what was going on and didn't do anything to stop it.
I think the answer is c for this question tbh well yah
Answer:
The Journal entry that Oriole Company will make to pay off the note and interest at maturity assuming that interest has been accrued to September 30 will be:
Dr Notes Payable 560,000
Dr Interest Payable 25,200
(560,000*6%*9/12)
Cr Cash 585,200
(560,000+25,200)
Explanation:
Based on the information given where Moss County Bank agrees to lend the Oriole Company $560000 on January 1 this means we have to Debit Note payable with 560,000 and since Oriole Company signs a $560000, 6%, 9-month this means we have to Debit Interest payable with 25,200 (560,000*6%*9/12) and Credit Cash with 585,200 (560,000+25,200).
