Answer and Explanation:
Clude had purchased the raw land three years ago for $150000 and treated it like a inventory. she constributed the property to south peak investments LLC in exchange for 10% profit interest. but south peak will hold it for investment purpose.
a) after 4 years from Cludes contribution south peak sells the land for $3000000 the gain would be $3000000 - 1500000 = 1500000. the character is of long term capital gains since ths LLC held ot as investment asset
b) if south peak sells the asset after 5 years six months then also the gain would be sa,e and character would be same since LLC has held the asset fore investments purpose and at the same time its holding period is above one year.
Answer:
1.$35,000
2.$6,300,000
Explanation:
The computation of Unit sales to earn the target income and Sales amount at required profit is given below:-
a. Contribution per unit = Unit sale price - Unit variable cost
= $180 - $135
= $45
Unit sales at required profit = (Sales cost + Required cost) ÷ Contribution per unit
= ($562,500 + $1,012,500) ÷ $45
= $1,575,000 ÷ $45
= $35,000
b. Sales amount at required profit = Unit sales at required profit × Unit sale price
= $35,000 × $180
= $6,300,000
The <span>money an investor receives above and beyond the money initially invested is called C. return.
Saving has to do with saving your money. Liquidity is the ability to pay your bills. Investment is when you invest your money into something, and eventually get it back, if your investment pays off.
</span>
Answer:
A) By product pricing
Explanation:
If you are able to sell your companies by products it is a great way to make more money and to reduce costs. Imagine if the cheese factories needed to throw away all that brine. They would need to develop some waste disposal facility which obviously costs money to build and operate. Instead they are lowering their costs by selling it and at the same time are getting more money. They would probably even give it away for free if no one was willing to pay for it.
Answer:
Option D. The accountant was a member of a professional organization.
Explanation:
The reason is that for a successful claim under the negligence act, the claimant have to prove following three things:
- Duty of care existed between the relation
- She has suffered economic harm &
- The harm was proximately caused by the accountant's breach of the duty of care.
So the accountant's membership is not a valid requirement under the negligence act for a successful claim.
