The answer is Daubert Standard or Ruling. This ruling makes
available a rule of evidence concerning the admissibility
of expert witnesses' testimony throughout United States federal legal measures.
Pursuant to this ruling, a party may raise a <span>Daubert motion</span>,
which is a extraordinary case of <span>motion in
limine</span> upturned earlier or for the duration of the trial to
eliminate the demonstration of unreserved indication to
the jury.
The logical answer is c provided that the "new, better idea" stand up to scrutiny under the scientific method.
Politics (b.) should never be a reason for changing scientific ideas.
Likewise, the fame of a particular scientist should have nothing to do with the modification of a scientific idea.
Science uses the scientific method and whether people are tired of old ideas or not is not a reason to change them.
Answer:
Because at some point in that food chain, the energy consumption has it's limit, and the predator will not have anything to hunt it. There is a limited amount of energy in a food chain that can go around, and once you reach the predator, that energy doesn't quite run out but it hits that limit where the chain has to repeat itself.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
Phylogenetic trees are only concerned with hard data (time points of when species evolve) and not soft data like how great a species is.