All categories

3 years ago

What is the completely factored form of the expression 16x2 + 8x + 32?

1 answer:

7 0

8 is a common factor for all coeficients so we factor it out first: 8(2x^2 + x + 4). Now we have to check can we factor the quadratic equasion in the brackets to linear factors. To do that we need to check is the discriminant D=b^2 - 4ac > 0 where a=2, b=1 and c=4. When we insert our numbers, we get: D= -31. We see that D < 0 so 8(2x^2 + x + 4) is the completely factored form.

You might be interested in

Patrick has a 600-meter skein of yarn. He used 248.9 meters of yarn to make a hat. Does he have enough yarn to make an scarf tha

Masja [62]

Patrick has a total of 600 meters skein of yarn.

He used 248.9 meters of yarn to make a hat.

Now, If he has used 248.9 meters of yarn, we need to find how much yarn has he left.

We need to subtract the amount of yarn used from the total length. That is, 248.9 from 600.

$600-248.9=351.1$

So, now Patrick has left 351.1 meters of yarn.

Patrick needs to make a scarf that needs 354.03 meters of yarn but after making a hat he has left with only 351.1 meters of yarn. Therefore, Patrick does not have enough yarn to make a scarf.

6 0

2 years ago

An emergency patient is being seen today because of a lost "filling.” The dentist examines

saveliy_v [14]

A temporary dental material that would most likely be used to replace the lost filling be reinforced zinc oxide- eugenol composition.

A temporary restoration material is used to keep the patient comfortable for a short period of time. It prevents the dislocation of tooth and maintain functionality.

So, a temporary dental material that would most likely be used to replace the lost filling be reinforced zinc oxide- eugenol composition.

Learn more here:

brainly.com/question/23558592?referrer=searchResults

6 0

2 years ago

Help pleaseeeeeeeeee

sergij07 [2.7K]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

47 -6√10

Step-by-step explanation:

As you know, the area of a square is the square of the side length. It can be helpful here to make use of the form for the square of a binomial.

(a -b)² = a² - 2ab + b²

(√2 -3√5)² = (√2)² - 2(√2)(3√5) + (3√5)²

= 2 - 6√10 + 3²(5)

= 47 -6√10

Check

√2-3√5 ≈ -5.29399 . . . . . . . . note that a negative value for side length makes no sense, so this isn't about geometry, it's about binomials and radicals

(√2-3√5)² ≈ 28.02633

47 -6√10 ≈ 28.02633

5 0

2 years ago

1. If a scale factor is applied to a figure and all dimensions are changed proportionally, what is the effect on the perimeter o

tester [92]

Answer:

Part 1) The perimeter of the new figure must be equal to the perimeter of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor (see the explanation)

Part 2) The area of the new figure must be equal to the area of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor squared

Part 3) The new figure and the original figure are not similar figures (see the explanation)

Step-by-step explanation:

Part 1) If a scale factor is applied to a figure and all dimensions are changed proportionally, what is the effect on the perimeter of the figure?

we know that

If all dimensions are changed proportionally, then the new figure and the original figure are similar

When two figures are similar, the ratio of its perimeters is equal to the scale factor

The perimeter of the new figure must be equal to the perimeter of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor

Part 2) If a scale factor is applied to a figure and all dimensions are changed proportionally, what is the effect on the area of the figure?

we know that

If all dimensions are changed proportionally, then the new figure and the original figure are similar

When two figures are similar, the ratio of its areas is equal to the scale factor squared

The area of the new figure must be equal to the area of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor squared

Part 3) What would happen to the perimeter and area of a figure if the dimensions were changed NON-proportionally? For example, if the length of a rectangle was tripled, but the width did not change? Or if the length was tripled and the width was decreased by a factor of 1/4?

we know that

If the dimensions were changed NON-proportionally, then the ratio of the corresponding sides of the new figure and the original figure are not proportional

That means

The new figure and the original figure are not similar figures

therefore

Corresponding sides are not proportional and corresponding angles are not congruent

A) If the length of a rectangle was tripled, but the width did not change?

Perimeter

The original perimeter is P=2L+2W

The new perimeter would be P=2(3L)+2W ----> P=6L+2W

The perimeter of the new figure is greater than the perimeter of the original figure but are not proportionals

Area

The original area is A=LW

The new area would be A=(3L)(W) ----> A=3LW

The area of the new figure is three times the area of the original figure but its ratio is not equal to the scale factor squared, because there is no single scale factor

B) If the length was tripled and the width was decreased by a factor of 1/4?

Perimeter

The original perimeter is P=2L+2W

The new perimeter would be P=2(3L)+2(W/4) ----> P=6L+W/2

The perimeter of the new figure and the perimeter of the original figure are not proportionals

Area

The original area is A=LW

The new area would be A=(3L)(W/4) ----> A=(3/4)LW

The area of the new figure is three-fourth times the area of the original figure but its ratio is not equal to the scale factor squared, because there is no single scale factor

5 0

2 years ago

How do I do problem number one

jolli1 [7]

So you have to find something that multiples to six but also somehow either subtracts or adds to five. So I would pick 2 and 3 because two plus three is five. Then you would write out your equation
X2+2x+5x+6
This may not be the way your teacher taught however it is much easier for me to do it this way.

5 0

3 years ago