Associative property (associative laws)
Answer:
c) 2
d) 0.96
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
a) probability density function.
![\displaystyle\int^{\infty}_{\infty}f(x) dx = 1\\\\\displaystyle\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}2x^{-3}dx = 1\\\\\displaystyle\int^{\infty}_{1}2x^{-3}dx\\\\\Rightarrow \big[-x^{-2}\big]^{\infty}_1\\\\\Rightarrow -(0-1) = 1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%5Cint%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D_%7B%5Cinfty%7Df%28x%29%20dx%20%3D%201%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cdisplaystyle%5Cint%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D_%7B-%5Cinfty%7D2x%5E%7B-3%7Ddx%20%3D%201%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cdisplaystyle%5Cint%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D_%7B1%7D2x%5E%7B-3%7Ddx%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20%5Cbig%5B-x%5E%7B-2%7D%5Cbig%5D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D_1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20-%280-1%29%20%3D%201)
Thus, it is a probability density function.
b) cumulative distribution function.
c) mean of the distribution
d) probability that the size of random particle will be less than 5 micrometers
The appropriate choice is ...
... On Line 3, Brianna should have divided by 0.1 instead of subtracting 0.1.
_____
Had Brianna simplified her effort properly on line 4, she would have
... -0.1 +0.1x = -1.4
putting her essentially back where she started—with a 2-step equation.
Answer:
sorry I don't know the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
i will get some points that's why sorry
Answer:
It has become a cliché to describe the watch business in America
as a game of musical chairs, yet no other seems quite as
relevant.
Source: New York Times
O chord
O reinforcement
ооо
O metaphor
appendix
Step-by-step explanation:
just use ģooglr
