1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mrac [35]
3 years ago
9

Dorsey Company manufactures three products from a common input in a joint processing operation. Joint processing costs up to the

split-off point total $370,000 per quarter. For financial reporting purposes, the company allocates these costs to the joint products on the basis of their relative sales value at the split-off point. Unit selling prices and total output at the split-off point are as follows: Product Selling Price Quarterly Output A $ 24.00 per pound 13,800 pounds B $ 18.00 per pound 21,500 pounds C $ 30.00 per gallon 5,000 gallons Each product can be processed further after the split-off point. Additional processing requires no special facilities. The additional processing costs (per quarter) and unit selling prices after further processing are given below: Product Additional Processing Costs Selling Price A $ 81,150 $ 29.50 per pound B $ 117,125 $ 24.50 per pound C $ 52,900 $ 38.50 per gallon Required: 1. What is the financial advantage (disadvantage) of further processing each of the three products beyond the split-off point? 2. Based on your analysis in requirement 1, which product or products should be sold at the split-off point and which product or products should be processed further?
Business
2 answers:
ankoles [38]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A (5,250) sold at split-off

B 22,625 continue

C (10,400) sold at split-off

Explanation:

Result for further processing:

quantity ( further process price - raw price) less further processing cost

Product A

13,800 pounds x (29.5 - 24) - 81,150 = (5,250)

Product B

21,500 pounds (24.50 - 18) - 117,125 = 22,625

Product C

5,000 gallon ( 38.5 - 30) - 52,900 = (10,400)

We must understand that the join processing cost are already incurred (sunk) therefore, not relevant. We hould check if the further process increases or not the gross profit.

As B is the only which increase the gross profit we continue the processing. THe other product based on our cost structure are not viable

Masteriza [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A. ($5250) if sold at split-off

B. $22625 if processed further

C. ($10400) if sold at split off

Explanation:

<em>Calculations</em>: Quantity (Further process price – Raw price) – Further processing cost

Product A: 13800 (29.5 – 24) – (81150) = (5250)

Product B: 21500 (24.5 – 18) – 117125= 22625

Product C: 5000 (38.5 – 30) – 52900 = (10400)

1. Since, the split-off costs are already incurred so they can’t be reversed that is why they are called sunk costs but can see if the further process costs are adjustable so that we can cut them or pursue them if they are profitable.

2. The product B is the only product which is profitable and could be further processed, otherwise the products A and C are non-profitable.

You might be interested in
individuals differ in risk aversion because of: group of answer choices differences in their insurance. moral hazard. adverse se
Gwar [14]

Individuals differ in risk aversion because of differences in income or wealth.

  • Risk aversion is the propensity of people to choose outcomes with low uncertainty over those with high uncertainty, even when the average outcome of the latter is equal to or higher in monetary worth than the more definite event. This tendency is shown in both economics and finance.
  • Risk aversion is the tendency to avoid danger. A risk-averse investor is one who prioritizes money preservation over the potential for a higher-than-average return. Price volatility and investment risk are the same.
  • If someone would rather take the risk and maybe receive nothing than accept a definite payment (certainty equivalent) of less than $50 (for instance, $40), they are considered to be risk averse. If they have no preference between the wager and a specific $50 payoff, they are risk neutral.

Thus the correct answer is d.

Refer here to learn more about risk aversion: brainly.com/question/8394406

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Assume Intel Corporation (INTC) and Texas Instruments (TXN) report the following information. Intel Corp Texas Instruments ($ mi
VLD [36.1K]

Answer:

2015 FAT= 4,168323393

2016 FAT= 3,87219893

Explanation:

2015 2016

sales plant 34209 38826

propierty 15768 17111

net sales  12580 13392

propierty net 3018 3899

 

​FAT=Net Sales​/Average Fixed Assets  

 

2015 FAT=12580/3018  

2018 FAT=13392/(3899-3018)  

 

2015 FAT= 4,168323393

2016 FAT= 3,87219893

7 0
3 years ago
Compensation for top executives (e.g., CEOs and CFOs) has become more variable over time. For example, recent data show that in
Luba_88 [7]

Answer:

Because :- CEOs & CFOs can have significant impacts throughout the entire business, & the type of reward plan will encourage the CFOs to work in a more rational manner.

Explanation:

CEOs & CFOs are a part of upper level of management of an organisation. Effectiveness & Efficiency of their managerial skills is very crucial to management of company. So, to encourage proper management of companies by senior managers, they can be incentivised by mix of fixed & variable salary structure. The variable component of salary as per company performance under CEO or CFO, positively motivates them to improvise their performance, which subsequently improves company performance.

3 0
3 years ago
On January 1, 2020, Waterway Company purchased 11% bonds, having a maturity value of $312,000 for $336,270.95. The bonds provide
mafiozo [28]

Answer and Explanation:

The journal entries are shown below:

1. 11% bonds payable $336,270.95

         To cash  $336,270.95

(Being the bond purchased for cash is recorded)

2. Cash ($312,000 × 11%)      $34,320

       To Interest revenue ($336,270.95 × 9%) $30,264

       To 11% bond payable $4,056

(Being the interest revenue is recorded)

Fair value adjustment $1,685.05

       To Unrealized gain $1,685.05

(Being the recognition of fair value is recorded)

It is computed below:

= (333,900 - ($336,270.95 - $4,056) )

3. Unrealized gain $13,000     ($333,900 - $320,900)

            To fair value adjustment $13,000

(Being the  recognition of fair value is recorded)

8 0
3 years ago
Which is the BEST definition of marginal benefit?
Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer:

the possible income from producing an additional item.

Explanation:

hope this helps if not let me know

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Students have the right to express themselves through speech provided the speech is not obscene, vulgar, or disruptive.
    12·2 answers
  • Wendy worked as a salesperson and had the highest total dollar value of sales for all salespersons in her company in the first q
    10·1 answer
  • Level of employment reached when there is no cyclical unemployment.
    7·1 answer
  • On March 13, a company writes off a customer's account of $3,500. On June 3, the customer unexpectedly pays the $3,500 balance.
    5·1 answer
  • Set during the marketing research process, __________ are the specific, measurable goals the decision maker seeks to achieve in
    5·1 answer
  • The marketing concept is a philosophy that a business organization should employ to satisfy customers' needs while achieving the
    7·1 answer
  • The following standards have been established for a raw material used to make product O84:Standard quantity of the material per
    7·1 answer
  • Jerrod is relatively new to Xenon Corporation and wants to make sure that he makes a good impression on his coworkers and superv
    15·1 answer
  • During the first month of operations, a manufacturer incurs the following costs related to activities within its factory:
    10·1 answer
  • at the end of your car lease period, you intend to turn in the car, and you will not pay extra at that time based on the residua
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!