Answer:
obtuse?
Step-by-step explanation:
Here is how we get the answer....
First, replace f(x) with y . ...
Replace every x with a y and replace every y with an x .
Solve the equation from Step 2 for y . ...
Replace y with f−1(x) f − 1 ( x ) . ...
Verify your work by checking that (f∘f−1)(x)=x ( f ∘ f − 1 ) ( x ) = x and (f−1∘f)(x)=x ( f − 1 ∘ f ) ( x ) = x are both true.
Range is all real
(-inf, inf )
Answer:
a) H0 : u = 28.5%
H1 : u < 28.5%
b) critical value = - 1.645
c) test statistic Z= - 1.41
d) Fail to reject H0
e) There is not enough evidence to support the professor's claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
P = 28.5% ≈ 0.285
X = 210
n = 800
Level of significance = 0.05
a) The null and alternative hypotheses are:
H0 : u = 28.5%
H1 : u < 28.5%
b) Given a 0.05 significance level.
This is a left tailed test.
The critical value =
The critical value = -1.645
c) Calculating the test statistic, we have:


Z = -1.41
d) Decision:
We fail to reject null hypothesis H0, since Z = -1.41 is not in the rejection region, <1.645
e) There is not enough evidence to support the professor's claim that the proportion of obese male teenagers decreased.