Answer:
D) it presumes there will be economic gains even if output does not become internationally competitive
Explanation:
The argument for import protection in developing countries to bring about industrialization differs from the infant-industry argument in that it presumes there will be economic gains even if the output does not become internationally competitive. International competitiveness is a step of the relative cost of services/goods from a nation. Countries that can provide a similar quality of goods at a cheaper cost are stated to be extra competitive.
Answer:
The increase in yield to maturity from 5.5% to 7% will cause the price of the bond to fall from $ 1,057.46 to $ 972.70
Explanation:
In order to ascertain the impact on the bond of a sudden increase in the yield to maturity from 5.5% to 7%, the present value of the bond, the current price is computed using yield of maturity of 5.5% and 7% respectively.
In calculating the present value, a discounting factor is used to state today's value of the future cash flows from the bond, given as 1/(1+r)^N, where r is the yield to maturity divided by 2 , in order to show that the bond is a semi-annual interest paying bond.The fact that the bond is a semiannual one means interest would be paid 14 times( 7 years *2)
The present value is computed in the attached.
Answer:
A. excess supply
Explanation:
The Keynesian expenditure-output model focuses on the total amount of spending in the economy, with no explicit mention of aggregate supply or of the price level. According to my research on this type of model, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the result of these values would lead to an excess amount of supply.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
a. 19.750 b. 138.250
Explanation:
A. We divide 158.000 by 8 to get the amount per year
158.000/8= 19.750
- Amortization expense (Db) 19.750
- Accumulated amortization (Cr) 19.750
B. On the balance sheet at the end of the first year, we would subtract those 19.750 to the gross value of the patent and the value of the patent would be
158.000 - 19.750 = 138.250
<u><em>Net carrying amount of the patent:</em></u><em> 138.250</em>