Answer:
d. 944 mm^3
Step-by-step explanation:
The area of a circle is given by ...
A = πr² . . . . . where r is the radius, half the diameter
The area of a circle with diameter 9 mm is ...
A = π(4.5 mm)² = 20.25π mm²
The area of the semi-circular end of the prism is half this value, or ...
semicircle area = (1/2)(20.25π mm²) = 10.125π mm² ≈ 31.809 mm²
__
The area of the rectangular portion of the end of the prism is the product of its width and height:
A = wh = (9 mm)(6 mm) = 54 mm²
Then the base area of the prism is ...
base area = rectangle area + semicircle area
= (54 mm²) +(31.809 mm²) = 85.809 mm²
__
This base area multiplied by the 11 mm length of the prism gives its volume:
V = Bh = (85.809 mm²)(11 mm) ≈ 944 mm³
The volume of the composite figure is about 944 mm³.
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
x² - 6x + 13 = 0
x² - 2(x)(3) + 3² - 3² + 13 = 0
(x - 3)² = -4
Answer:
36 cm2
Step-by-step explanation:
tep-by-Step:
Start with the formula:
Area = a2
Don't forget: a2 = a × a (a squared).
Substitute the side length into the formula. In our example, a = 6.
Area = 6^2 = 6 × 6 = 36 cm2
Answer:
The area of the square with sides of length 6 cm is 36 cm2.
1/2, because 3/10 + 1/5 = 5/10. that means that the other part of 1 is 5/10 or 1/2
One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?