1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexandra [31]
3 years ago
13

If you apply ghe change below to the quadratic parent function f(x)=x2 what is the equation of the new function? Shift 1 unit ri

ght vertically stretch by a factor of 5 reflect over the x-axis
Mathematics
1 answer:
saveliy_v [14]3 years ago
6 0

1 to left gives (x -1)^2

vertical stretch makes it 5(x - 1)^2

reflection in axis changes the sign to - :-

equation of new function is f(x) = -5(x - 1)^2

You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Someone please help<br> Me
Ne4ueva [31]

Answer:

dude r u in a cc rn for math?

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The difference 3 1/2 minus 1 1/2 must be<br> between and
bija089 [108]

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

3 1/2 - 1 1/2 = 2

PLS GIVE BRAINLIEST

5 0
3 years ago
What is the sum of all the positive integers from <br> √<br> 24<br> to <br> √<br> 102<br> ?
Eva8 [605]

Answer:

The sum of all positive integers is

5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10

              = <em>45</em>

Step-by-step explanation:

Because \sqrt{24} = 4.89 and \sqrt{102} = 10.09

So positive numbers between 4.9 and 10.09 are

 <em>5+6+7+8+9+10 = 45</em>

<em />

<em>Brainliest will be appreciated.</em>

7 0
2 years ago
2h − 3 = 3 Need some help
QveST [7]

Answer: Let's solve your equation step-by-step.

2h−3=3

Step 1: Add 3 to both sides.

2h−3+3=3+3

2h=6

Step 2: Divide both sides by 2.

2h/2 = 6/2

h = 3.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Sergio has 79 paintings in his art collection. He and other local painting collectors agreed to donate some paintings to the loc
    9·1 answer
  • You are driving along the coast at 45 mph. How many minutes should it take you to get to Ventura?
    8·1 answer
  • write the converse of the conditional statement "if a parallelogram has one right angle, then it is a rectangle
    12·2 answers
  • Given abcd efgh what is the measure of h
    7·2 answers
  • Whats a story that can be solved using the equation 18.50 ÷ 0.5=x?
    5·1 answer
  • If 6x +3= 2x+ 19, then x =
    7·2 answers
  • What is -4x&lt;8. I’m a little confused.
    14·1 answer
  • The width of the fountain in Luke's drawing from the example is 2 cm. What is the width of the fountain in Isabella's scale draw
    5·2 answers
  • 1. Bill decided to buy six books on history instead
    5·1 answer
  • Solve the system of equations by graphing. y = −5x y = x − 6 Part A Select the correct graph. A. Two lines graphed on a coordina
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!