Answer:
Egypt - 3200 BC, Birth of the Afterlife
Gods of Mesopotamia - 3200 BC, Home of the First Written Evidence of Religion
China- 1600 BC, the Divine Rulers
<em>Rome- 7 BC, Rise of Christianity</em>
Japan- Post Classic, Welcome Buddhism
China- 551 BC- Zhou dynasty
China- 300 BC, Yin and Yang
Airplanes brought several changes to our societies, lives and environment. Within the pros of this new mean of transport we can find the increase of the speed in which we travel and goods reach another shore. This affected positively the price of merchandises, which became easier to obtain around the world. What in the past was limited to be transported by land or across the sea, with the risk of never arriving, now it is very easy to obtain. Of course that they also opened a lot of new job opportunities for quite a few people. New careers were created and now a lot of people profit from this industry. Last but not least is the industry of tourism. Travelling has become much easier and practical since planes began to transport us.
On the other hand, the impact on the environment was not as good as in the others. Planes consume, and realease in the atmosphere, fosil fuels. This is limiting our natural resources at an incredible speed, apart from the fact that it contributes negatively to the matter of pollution.
Gezon and Kottak argue that the relatively high incidence of expanded family households among poorer North Americans is
"an adaptation to poverty".
A significantly more typical response from researchers, in any case, was to recommend that discussing the way of life of the underclass was commensurate to "faulting the victim." Bad conduct and poor decisions, in this view, were a justifiable adaptation to poverty and the absence of chance in individuals' lives. In spite of the fact that my examination on the underclass was given a neighborly gathering, the greater part of the scholarly network has mixed around the view that awful practices are a result, as opposed to a reason, of poverty.
Relative deprivation is a term that refers to that people join social movements because they feel deprived relative to other people with whom they identify.
<h3>What is relative deprivation?</h3>
It alludes to a starting point to analyze why people join social movements as a result of a situation of inequality within people with whom they identify.
An individual experiences said deprivation when he lacks common goods in other individuals and families in the social environment, affecting his effective situation.
Therefore, we can conclude that relative deprivation is a term that refers to that people join social movements because they feel deprived relative to other people with whom they identify.
Learn more about relative deprivation here: brainly.com/question/26869272
#SPJ4
