Answer:
341÷674+846 is exaclly 846.505934718
Answer:
6p
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
If BOTH equations are in slope-intercept form then the-graphing-? method would be best, but the-substitution-? method would also be effective since both y's are already by itself.
If ONE of the equations is solved for x or y and the other equation is not, then the-substitution-? method is best.
If BOTH equations are lined up in standard form & the coefficients of x or y are opposites then the BEST method is definitely the-elimination--? method.
If BOTH equations are lined up in standard form the elimination method would be best. But if the coefficient of x or y is 1, then the-substitution--? method is also effective.
Answer:
(115.2642, 222.7358).
Step-by-step explanation:
Given data:
type A: n_1=60, xbar_1=1827, s_1=168
type B: n_2=180, xbar_2=1658, s_2=225
n_1 = sample size 1, n_2= sample size 2
xbar_1, xbar_2 are mean life of sample 1 and 2 respectively. Similarly, s_1 and s_2 are standard deviation of 1,2.
a=0.05, |Z(0.025)|=1.96 (from the standard normal table)
So 95% CI is
(xbar_1 -xbar_2) ± Z×√[s1^2/n1 + s2^2/n2]
=(1827-1658) ± 1.96×sqrt(168^2/60 + 225^2/180)
= (115.2642, 222.7358).
He messed up step 2 he added instead of multiplying
