Answer:
you can use different types of research n ask people about information
Explanation:
it will make things easier for you about the challenges you will face and how to deal with them
Answer:
c) tries to develop goodwill for a company or even an industry.
Explanation:
Institutional Advertising is an advertising approach - attempting to promote a company, corporation, brand, business, institution, organisation entity. It's direct aim is not to focus on selling goods & services. It rather focuses on building a goodwill, rapport between the entity & the potential customers, associators. It is usually done via community outreach programmes, to address community & social image building largely.
Answer:
Price today = $26.54
Explanation:
The price of the stock can be calculated using the Dividend Discount Model (DDM). The DDM values the stock based on the present value of the expected future dividends from the stock.
The formula to calculate the price of the stock is attached.
Price today = 2.1 * (1+0.08) / (1+0.11) + 2.1 * (1+0.08) * (1+0.06) / (1+0.11)^2 +
2.1 * (1+0.08) * (1+0.06) * (1+0.04) / (1+0.11)^3 +
[(2.1 * (1+0.08) * (1+0.06) * (1+0.04) * (1+0.02)) / (0.11 - 0.02)] / (1+0.11)^3
Price today = $26.54
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
When an intoxicated person enters into a contract, the contract can either be enforceable, meaning held to the fullest extent of the law, or voidable by the intoxicated person. The court will look at two criteria that need to be present in order to make the contract voidable:
-
The intoxication was severe enough that the person entering into the contract was incapacitated.
-
The other party was aware of the intoxication at the time.
A voidable contract, in this instance, is one in which the intoxicated party can end the agreement under certain terms. To expand on the criteria above, in order for the intoxicated person to void the contract, there needs to be adequate proof that one of the following occurred:
-
The intoxicated person consumed enough alcohol or drugs to cause impairment in thinking sufficient enough that he could not understand the legal ramifications of entering into the contract.
-
The other party to the contract knew of the intoxication.
