If a patient with ascites does not respond to sodium restriction and diuretic therapy, excess fluid may be removed from the abdomen by: paracentesis
<h3>What is
paracentesis?</h3>
Paracentesis is the term used to describe the procedure known as peritoneocentesis, which involves inserting a needle into the peritoneal cavity to sample the peritoneal fluid (from the Greek v, "to pierce").
In particular, if medicine is unable to remove the fluid from the peritoneal cavity, surgery is used. The most common sign is developed ascites in cirrhotic individuals.
The location of the procedure is typically an outpatient clinic or a doctor's office. When carried out by a qualified practitioner, there is normally very little risk of infection, serious bleeding, or perforating a loop of the bowel. These last two risks can be considerably decreased by using ultrasonic guidance.
To learn more about paracentesis from the given link:
brainly.com/question/3521376
#SPJ4
That it would be dominated by corruption. Anti-Federalists believed that the new government would become corrupt and gain more and more power until it turned into a tyranny ruling.
Most of the work in considering and editing bills is done in A) congressional committees. These congressional committees are the first stop after a bill is introduced by a Congress member and is where most of the editing and adjustment takes place before a bill with either move on or be killed.
Answer:
- Good faith exception.
Explanation:
'Good Faith Exception' is demonstrated as the legal tenet which proffers the exemption or exception form the exclusionary rule as the IVth Amendment of U.S. Constitution states that 'if the evidence collected by the police through unlawful searches or seizures but done with a good faith belief, it could be admissible at the trial'.
As per the given description, <u>'good faith exception'</u> demonstrate the exemption to the exclusionary rule because the exclusionary rule usually states that evidence collected unlawfully or by violating the right to privacy would not be admissible during the trial but the 'good faith' exception states that 'if the law enforcement officers believe that their actions are in 'good-faith' it can be admissible by the court which marks the exception.
