<u>Answer:</u>
The decision from any journalist that violates the ethics of journalism is "A reporter writes a story about his wife’s company without revealing their relationship" and "A magazine runs a series of articles speculating about a celebrity’s medical history".
Option: (c) and (d)
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Society of Professional Journalists is the organization that represents the entire journalists of United States and it sets the boundary line for the journalist’s activities.
- For any journalist who attempts to write about the company of his wife without any mentioned relationship of theirs, it would violate the law.
- Similarly, it is beyond the ethics to write the series of reports about the medical history of celebrity.
Answer:
The acquisitive model explains the best competitive nature of government today. As resources dwindle, certain government agencies fight others to survive and Advance their agendas.
Explanation:
<span>When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which implement them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal that, they are endowed by their creator with certain unAlienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, government are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principals and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mandmknd are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. </span>
Answer:
They believe that the Bill of Rights are not necessary because the government should have control over these decisions.
The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.
Explanation:
Along with the idea of looking for new trade routes, they also hoped to find new sources of gold, silver, and other valuables. Additionally, Europeans saw exploration as a way to bring Christianity to other cultures that lived in other lands.
