Answer:
yes, all answers are correct
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: 64
Step-by-step explanation:
The right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
Let be an <em>exponential</em> function of the form
, where
and
are <em>real</em> numbers. A <em>horizontal</em> asymptote exists when
, which occurs for
.
For this function, the <em>horizontal</em> asymptote is represented by
and to change the value of the asymptote we must add the <em>parent</em> function by another <em>real</em> number (
), that is to say:
(1)
In this case, we must use
to obtain an horizontal asymptote of -3. Thus, the right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
To learn more on asymptotes, we kindly invite to check this verified question: brainly.com/question/8493280
Answer:
50
Step-by-step explanation:
you need to put first the 32 on top of 100 since it always goes over 100 then you put 16 over a blank and you divide 32 by 16 which equals 2 so since you divided at the top you need to divide at the bottom so you divide 100 by 2 and you get 50 so 50 is your answer