The best answer would be B-it can rule laws unconstitutional that violate protected rights. The Supreme court has complete jurisdiction. If they decide that a new law go against the Supreme Court, then they can rule it unconstitutional and the law would not be a law anymore.
I believe the answer is: <span> being more adaptable to, and flexible in, choosing how to respond to situations across cultures
Every cultures has a certain unique values and tradition that become the foundation of almost every decision making made by the members of that culture. Since this would most likely affect the outcome of the job, the workers need to be able to adapt to the unique culture that they face on the field.</span>
When you compare newly proposed information to information you already know, you are using inference, which is a level of critical thinking.
Etymologically, the word "infer" means to "carry ahead." Inferences are information stages in reasoning that connect premises to logical conclusions. The dichotomy between deduction and induction in inference theory, which dates at least to Aristotle in Europe, is a classic one (300s BCE). Deduction is inference that results in logical conclusions from premises inference that are known to be true or that are presumed to be true, while the logic of correct inference is investigated. A universal conclusion is inferred by induction from specific evidence.
Inference is studied in many different domains. Researchers in the information domains of logic, argumentation studies, and cognitive psychology inference traditionally study human inference (i.e., how people draw conclusions); artificial intelligence researchers create automated inference systems to mimic human inference.
Learn more about inference here
brainly.com/question/18622044
#SPJ4
Usually its the Custodian, as he is the last to leave.
I hope this helps! :)
