Answer:
1
Unitary elastic
Elasticity of demand is unitary elastic because the absolute value of elasticity is equal to 1.
Explanation:
Elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in price.
Elasticity of demand = percentage change in quantity demanded / percentage change in price
Percentage change in quantity demanded = (25 - 15) / 25 = 0.4 × 100 = 40%
Percentage change in price = ($5 - $7) / $5 = 0.4 × 100 = 40%
Elasticity of demand = 40% / 40% = 1
If coefficient of elasticity is equal to 1, demand is unit elastic. It means that a change in price has an equal efect on the quantity demanded. Quantity demanded has an equal and proportional change to changes in price.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The correct answer is: False
Explanation:
Answer:
credit rationing
Explanation:
Credit rationing is a situation in which borrowers give out a fixed amount of loan to lenders for a specified time at a rate tied to the market interest rate. In this situation, loans do not exceed a certain amount from the borrower no matter what attractive offers are given by the lenders to be able to get a larger loan amount. This is done by the borrower becasue the borrower is earning maximum profits from interest rates and also is a means to maintain equilibrum between loan funds and loan demands.
Cheers.
Answer:
We can assume that both Strike and Bailey are American companies and that they operate in that US under the UCC rules. Under UCC rules they are both considered merchants since they trade with the goods related to the contract. Strike's offer was very precise and Bailey's acceptance was made in a reasonable manner which can be considered a valid acceptance.
The only difference exists with the shipping company, which the UCC rules consider a conflicting term and Strike should have either objected or ratified it before sending the goods. Since Strike didn't object Bailey's terms, then by using a different truck company it is breaching the contract.
Real estate license holder serving as a representative in an intermediary transaction offer <u><em>advice and opinions</em></u> to a client that was not offered under dual brokerage.
The appointment of Real Estate license holders to assist buyers and sellers in an intermediary transaction enables those real estate license holders to provide advise and opinions during the course of talks, in contrast to the practice of dual brokerage. Under the dual brokerage system, license holders were expected to act in a fair and impartial manner. Commission fees are not tied to representation, and it is against the law for license holders to expose sensitive information belonging to the other parties involved in a transaction.
To know more about real estate refer to:
brainly.com/question/10336196
#SPJ4