Answer:
INTR
Explanation:
INTR is an essential part of the academic program that every student must take in each semester. This course is also known as the applied learning practicum and it is used to ensure that students have both theoretical knowledge as well as practical field experience. This will help students to apply theoretical knowledge to real-life situations.
Answer:
Tariff of 1832
Explanation:
The Tariff of 1832 was enacted to replace the 1828 import tariffs commonly known as Tariffs of Abomination. Most southern states did not like it, but its greatest opposition came from South Carolina since its economy depended greatly in foreign trade. Back then America's largest export was cotton produced by southern states.
Due to South Carolina's extreme opposition, it was replaced by the Compromise Tariff of 1833. This last tariff would gradually decrease the tax rates until they fell back to 1816 levels, which was approximately 20%.
The Nullification Crisis refers to a legal process carried out in South Carolina that determined that federal taxes, specifically import tariffs were unconstitutional and shouldn't apply to them. The problem is that the Supreme Court decides what is unconstitutional or not, not a state court.
The reason is <span>Marketing research is expensive.
</span>The established firm usually has a large amount of capital at its disposal, so they could do market research in order to strengthen their position.
Small business on the other hand, usually struggle to even barely continuing their operation for the next month.
Answer:
Net operating income= 565,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Krazy Kayaks sells its entry-level kayaks for $750 each. Its variable cost is $500 per kayak. Fixed costs are $25,000 per month for volumes up to 1,100 kayaks. Above 1,100 kayaks, monthly fixed costs are $60,000.
Sales= 2,500*750= 1,875,000
COGS= (500*2,500)= (1,250,000)
Gross profit= 625,000
Fixed costs= (60,000)
Net operating income= 565,000
Answer:
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the main impact of the legal constraints would be that they have the ability to change the way that the economic pie is divided among the different parties, which in term can completely change their well-being. This is because those that receive more wealth are able to provide a better quality of life that those that did not.
