Incomplete question. The options:
a. green marketing
b. effect-related marketing
c. cause-related marketing
d. relationship marketing
Answer:
<u>c. cause-related marketing</u>
Explanation:
Note, a marketing effort that is centered primarily on making an impact or a said cause; usually, it involves a mutually benefiting agreement, in which a corporation would collaborate with a non-profit such that
- the corporation benefits (maybe in terms of sales), and
- the non-profit benefits in terms of fulfilling a cause.
The idea is that consumers would be drawn if they see that when they pay for a particular service or product, they will be contributing to a good cause.
Answer:
Explanation:
The T account is presented below:
Allowance for Doubtful Debts
Jan 29 $5,850 Jan 1 Beginning balance $54,200
Aug 9 $11,850 April 18 $4,000
Dec 31 $52,160 Nov 7 $7,000
Dec 31 Unadjusted
balance $4,660
Dec 31 Adjusting entry $64,660
Dec 31 Adjusted balance $60,000
Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
Answer:
$20,996.49
Yes
Explanation:
Net present value is the present value of after tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.
NPV can be found using a financial calculator.
Cash flow in year 0 = $-250,000
Cash flow in year 1 = $83,000
Cash flow in year 2 = $43,000
Cash flow in year 3 = $76,000
Cash flow in year 4 = $127,000
Cash flow in year 5 = $49,000
I = 12%
NPV = $20,996.49
The company should accept the project because the NPV is postive.
To find the NPV using a financial calacutor:
1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
2. After inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
3. Press compute
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
To make it feasible it will need to operate 7 or more planes.
Explanation:
450,000 maintenance facility
useful life of 15 year
salvage value of 100,000
<u>saving cost per plane:</u>
third party cost - own facility cost = cost savings
35,000 - 25,000 = 10,000
present value of the salvage value: (present value of a lump sum)
salvage $ 100,000
time 15 years
Minimum accepter rate of return: 0.12000
PV 18,269.6261
present worth of the facility:
450,000- 18,268.63 = 431,731.37
Now we determinate the PMT over a 15 years period to know the cost savings per year to justify the facility:
PV 431,731
time 15
rate 0.12
C $ 63,388.630
As each plane cost savings are 10,000
63,388.62 / 10,000 = 6.39
the company will need to operate 7 or more planes.
