The economic model Brazil fit into regarding its development path would be Gross Domestic Product Improvement. GDP of Brazil will measure three sides of its economy and that would be their expenditure, output, and income.
The answer to your question is letter A.
Literally did an idiotic thing which limited his power. he was very unpopular with the people and especially the barons.. thats why. he was forced
This is an interesting question, however very subjective. There are no set 'correct' or 'incorrect' answers, unless this question is linked with a broader concept that you have been learning about? But here would be my answer...
Firstly, I do believe this is impossible. But this is a pretty closed answer, unless I give reasoning. It also depends what you mean by harmony? In this answer I am assuming you mean no conflict- so forgive me if I have totally misunderstood.
1- Oppression
It is inevitable that people will have different agendas, or motives for wanting to do certain things. This causes conflict, obviously including negative conflict. To achieve 'Harmony', some people would have to compromise on their beliefs and actions- and how they live their lives. Who would be the ones compromising? If there was complete harmony, these people would be unable to question this, or even unwilling. People would most probably become 'brainwashed', unaware of the compromises they are making in their lives. This brings up another very interesting question- Is peace and harmony more important than free will?
2- Extreme boredom/ lack of meaning to anything
Would harmony even exist if there was no conflict? To put it in other words, how would you explain harmony without referring either directly or indirectly to conflict?
What gives people the drive to fight for what they want? Not all conflict is negative, and one conflict can appear positive to one person, and negative to another.
What would we do all day? Many jobs would simply cease to exist- Lawyer? No. Relies on conflict. Social worker? Same thing. Even less obviously linked jobs such as musicians, teachers, politicians, athletes, would be affected. Ever noticed how on the news, many of the stories are about conflict? That is what interests us. Gives us something to debate about. There would be no diversity in culture, perhaps we would all be vegetarians or vegans (if 'everyone' refers to all living organisms on earth). Upon further reflection, harmony doesn't seem as much of a 'utopia', or perfect world, as perhaps it first seems
<span>In the highway transportation system, pedestrians are people who walk, so they would not be called drivers. Therefore the answer is not low risk drivers or youthful drivers. The phrase "beginning users" refers to people who are just in the early stages of learning something or using something. In general, this phrase would not necessarily be used to describe pedestrians, drivers, or cyclists. The only remaining answer is "roadway users", which makes perfect sense. Pedestrians, drivers, and cyclists are people who are using the roadway, therefore they are roadway users.</span>
