In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
Answer:
The DNA is cut using special chemicals called restriction enzymes,.
DNA ligase are used to insert genes and other pieces of DNA into plasmids.
Answer:
Pencil is an element and a heterogeneous mixture
Explanation:
It's harmful to humans; especially Children and Infants. Because it affects the development of the brain and nervous system
Answer:
Electron transport is the process by NADH + H+ and FADH2 are converted to NAD+ and FAD, donating electrons and hydrogen ions to oxygen
Explanation:
