Answer:
D) $1120
Explanation:
The goods Sally purchase were $1440, and with the 25% discount, she would have paid $1080, because 25% of $1440 is $360. Since she returned 1/3, she would have only spent $720, because $1080/3 is also $360. $720+$400 from the beginning would be $1120
Answer:
The GDP will increase by $2,000 as a result of these transactions
Explanation:
When trying to calculate the increase in GDP caused by a series of transactions, we do not add all the transactions, instead we look at the price of the final good and that is the increase in GDP. In this case the final good is the necklace that the store department sells for $2,000 therefore we will only consider the final transaction. So the GDP will increase by $2,000 as a result of this series of transactions because the final good sold for $2,000.
<span>this will contribute to illustrate and strengthen your argument. Adding this supplementary materials will not only 'spice up' your speach but also demonstrate your proficiency of the issues you are talking about. For these reasons, the audience will regard you as a trustworthy person and more easily believe your statements.</span>
Answer:
Inventar (no copiar de internet) un microcuento fantástico con alguno de los siguientes hechos sobrenaturales o inverosímiles: fantasmas, transformaciones, poderes increíbles, etc.
Explanation:
Answer:
The statement that would prove that Zeke made a faulty decision is that Both an employee and a a former employee can raised a grievance
Explanation:
Based on the information given about Zeke who is the employer , Gavin the employee and the formal employee who was dismissed The statement that would prove that Zeke the employer made a faulty decision is that Both an employee and the former or ex employee can raised a grievance reason been that settling dispute due to Grievance at a place of work can only take place with a current employee and not a formal employee , ex employee or a dismissed employee.
Therefore resolving Grievance at a place of work often take place with an employee with in the work environment and not with a formal employee.
